Guest wrote:Of course she will get full custody. I don't think he ever wanted to have children with Jolie and that whole Aniston wouldn't have his baby was probably all lies to justify his cheating on his wife. Antis have been right all along.
That's exactly what I have been saying myself from the start. I firmly believe it was SHE who persuaded him to go onto the Diane Sawyer show and say what he said, justifying himself by using "I wannnted chillluns!" which is just as much 'child exploitation' as anything Jolie has done: for PR purposes he was 'going along" with her "fambly farce" i.e her willingness to exploit people's UNWILLINGNESS to subject a woman to unpleasantness when she has a child with her, or to feel instinctively protective of such women and to refuse to believe they would subject their children to unpleasantness It all started with that Kenya beach photo, you know! "Such a cuuuuuute famleeee!" and people fell for her bullshit like bowling pins, especially after the Z adoption; let's not forget she tried to palm Z off as an AIDS orphan at one point (a forewarning of the mastectomy/ cancer patient " farce) and that she was pregnant when she went to Africa to pick Z up.
(She was moving in with BP by Aug. 5 so allowing for a certain amount of lag time due to recriminations, accusations, remonstrations, demonstrations,tergiversation, and conspirations, she had to have told him the news at least 3 weeks previously. His unwillingness to participate fully in Z's adoption and his arm's length approach to the situation convinced me he planned to duck out once the adoption was completed; Jolie evidently thought so too, and neatly checkmated him with that "oldest trick' pregnancy.
It is, no question, the fact that Jolie was willing to stoop that much lower than anyone else and exploit children and the human instinct to protect children that made her 'notorious as a "manipulator of PR" But i still wonder if it was all her; the CIA would have no such qualms at using children or encouraging her to use them in such a fashion either; in fact I am sure it was they who facilitated her *cough-cough* "adoption" (so-called) of Pax. (I bet they were able to bring over a great deal more white powder heroin from that stunt, than they did that mere tonne of high grade cocaine back in the nineties, in one fell swoop and right under the noses of the DEA, too)
It was in fact AFTER the Pax adoption that the ho started to go 'full-time" with the private jet thing. Even for her "missions of mercy". And if she is using her kids for a "cover" for more sinister activities, well I'd say that needs to be called out. It's possible she's back on board with the CIA; I can't see them giving up on such a lucrative farce easily and attractive famous child predators that can lure foreign politicians to their doom aren't exactly a dime a dozen!
People weep potfuls of tears for their families and their material possessions, but who weeps because he has not been able to see God?