That's pretty damning isn't it? This article makes some irrefutably valid points.
They did fall like controlled explosions.
And there is the Bush link again
I said it once, I'll say it again - war crimes against humanity (in the name of oil).
Fact is, oil companies have been trumping up wars, equipping people with weapons to take out 'obstructions' to oil, way before 9/11 (read an article some years back about 'S(hell) on earth'.
Also heard stories, many years ago, about people coming up with alternative sources of energy had their patents brought out by oil companies and were threatened with their life into silence.
Then there was the interesting point raised by Mike Myers, that they wanted to put an oil pipeline, running between Afghanistan and Iran to the coast - but the Taliban didn't play ball. Boom - 9/11 - off to take out the Taliban, put in new 'friendly' rulers, no worries on the pipeline - or was it still not completely satisfactory? From the schematic I saw, the pipeline would have taken a more direct route (thus saving money) if it could have cut through parts of Iran as well.
How quickly after Iraq was attacked did Bush start talking about the 'threat in Iran'? I predicted that would happen based on the schematic I saw, if the pipeline was a major motivator, and lo and behold, what do you know.