9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post a reply


In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you to tick the I'm not a robot checkbox.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by jengurl1987 » Fri May 27, 2016 8:51 pm

I lived about 3 hours from NYC and vividly remember the horrific pictures from that day. I believe that jinjin may be right; the buildings could have been constructed to fall straight down vertically to minimize casualties.

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by KiltyCol » Tue May 03, 2016 9:46 pm

jinjin wrote:I trust the engineers designed the building to collapse the way that it did to minimize harm to others.


Very interesting point.

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by jinjin » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:35 pm

I trust the engineers designed the building to collapse the way that it did to minimize harm to others.

Re: ...

Post by tower208 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:19 pm

jojo22 wrote::shock:

That's pretty damning isn't it? This article makes some irrefutably valid points.

They did fall like controlled explosions.

And there is the Bush link again :evil:

I said it once, I'll say it again - war crimes against humanity (in the name of oil).

Fact is, oil companies have been trumping up wars, equipping people with weapons to take out 'obstructions' to oil, way before 9/11 (read an article some years back about 'S(hell) on earth'.

Also heard stories, many years ago, about people coming up with alternative sources of energy had their patents brought out by oil companies and were threatened with their life into silence.

Then there was the interesting point raised by Mike Myers, that they wanted to put an oil pipeline, running between Afghanistan and Iran to the coast - but the Taliban didn't play ball. Boom - 9/11 - off to take out the Taliban, put in new 'friendly' rulers, no worries on the pipeline - or was it still not completely satisfactory? From the schematic I saw, the pipeline would have taken a more direct route (thus saving money) if it could have cut through parts of Iran as well.

How quickly after Iraq was attacked did Bush start talking about the 'threat in Iran'? I predicted that would happen based on the schematic I saw, if the pipeline was a major motivator, and lo and behold, what do you know.

Oil companies are the root of all evil.

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by Mac » Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:49 am

stonecastle wrote:All of the 9/11 conspiracy theories have long since been thoroughly debunked. See this site: http://www.debunking911.com
That is quite an indepth site which examines in detail each alleged part of the conspiracy theories such as the alleged presence of thermite.

Have you forgotten that day and the news pictures of the distruction?

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by stonecastle » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:18 pm

All of the 9/11 conspiracy theories have long since been thoroughly debunked. See this site: http://www.debunking911.com
That is quite an indepth site which examines in detail each alleged part of the conspiracy theories such as the alleged presence of thermite.

Re:

Post by bobeee1 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:40 pm

xxintergirlxxy wrote:Come on Guys, you dont seriously think that us Brits seriously fell for the aricraft demolishing the towers theory do you?

We all know what happened but it is politically incorrect to say so

When politicians stumble on the truth they pick themselves up and step over it

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by bobeee1 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:32 pm

Politicians often stumble On the truth but they just get up and walk around it

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by bobeee1 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:16 pm

Politicians often stumble on the truth but they just get up and walk around it

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by misseliza » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:32 am

it has been planned

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by theAlphaDuck » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:41 pm

well we all saw the twin towers hit by two planes - there can be no doubting that -

as for building 7 and the Pentagon

well you would have to be a pretty shitty intelligence service not to take advantage of that situation to bury some funds and "Lose" some assets.

with the demolition of those two offices a well funded, well placed completely independent and of course completely deniable and invisible Agency could be formed - answerable only to itself - able to do all the dirty and nasty things that the CIA can't -

somehow i cannot see Bush being against the formation of such an organisation - but being what it is - there is no hard evidence to support it -

still - It's what i would have done

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by capilot » Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:06 pm

That's one of the things about the Truthers -- they never actually quote experts on the subject, or if they do, it's an expert in some other field. Like if they quote a geologist as saying it was definitely a demolition job. Or the claims that the heat of the fire wasn't enough to weaken steel, but they never actually quote a metallurgist as saying so.

My latest favorite is people insisting that the buildings came down faster than freefall. Ummm, hello. Laws of physics. That's not possible no matter how the buildings were felled.

And this is what underlies my objection to these stupid conspiracy theories: Conspiracy theories are fed by inconsistencies in the official story. But here's the thing: Things which are inconsistent in the official story are STILL INCONSISTENT in the conspiracy theory version.

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by lightouch1938 » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:45 pm

Rubbish we saw it happen

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by swee » Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:55 am

*bump*

Re: 9/11 The Truth - We Have Been Deceived

Post by Guest » Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:17 am

[quote="stonecastle"]9/11 was not an inside job at all! These 9/11 conspiracy theories have been debunked a long time ago now. If people still believe then they should visit sites like http://www.debunking911.com[/quote]
Not read it all, the only real conspiracy I think concerns some design features of the twin towers that were there to aid demolition at a future date when the building became life-expired. and not intended to deal with a completely unexpected type of incident such as two deliberate impacts by large aircraft. Really just a cover-up of a potentially embarrassing minor detail.

Nothing deliberate and no conspiracy by the authorities.

Top